Monthly Archives: November 2004

Wow! Just found this on the Internet Archive. They have a seven part series of videos of Michael Badnarik’s class on the US Constitution available for free download. Fantastic…

From Space.com:

The meteors will appear to emanate from out of the so-called “Sickle” of Leo, but prospective viewers should not concentrate on that area of the sky around Leo, but rather keep their eyes moving around to different parts of the sky.
Because Leo does not start coming fully into view until the after midnight hours, that would be the best time to concentrate on looking for the Leonid meteors.
The hours after midnight are generally best for watching for “shooting stars” anyway, because before midnight we are riding on the back side of the Earth in its orbit around the Sun, whereas after midnight we are on the front or advancing side. After midnight the only meteoroids escaping collision are those ahead of the Earth and moving in the same direction with velocities exceeding 18.5 miles per second. All others we will either overtake or meet head-on. But before midnight, when we are on the backside, the only meteoroids we encounter are those with velocities high enough to overtake the Earth.
Therefore, on the average, morning meteors appear brighter and faster than those we see in the evening.
And because the Leonids are moving along in their orbit around the Sun in a direction opposite to that of Earth, they slam into our atmosphere nearly head-on, resulting in the fastest meteor velocities possible: 45 miles per second (72 kilometers per second). Such speeds tend to produce bright meteors, which leave long-lasting streaks or trains in their wake.

The first snow of 2004 is falling outside. Damn, I want to move to Anguilla…

Japanese robotocist Masahiro Mori made an interesting observation that has come to be known as the “uncanny valley”:

Stated simply, the idea is that if one were to plot emotional response against similarity to human appearance and movement, the curve is not a sure, steady upward trend. Instead, there is a peak shortly before one reaches a completely human ‘look’ . . . but then a deep chasm plunges below neutrality into a strongly negative response before rebounding to a second peak where resemblance to humanity is complete.

In other words, there’s a point just before 100% realism where human models/robots/puppets appear freakishly frightening – the living dead, so to speak. Many of us have experienced the valley when viewing figures in wax museums. There’s just something, well, wrong with the figure. I’ve had this same feeling when viewing CG figures, especially when they are animated. The eyes just don’t look right. Even when the eyes dart and shift in a supposedly natural manner, there’s still something just “off” that gives goosebumps. As production companies strive towards fully realistic CG movies, this will be the biggest barrier to acceptance by the general public.

“The Polar Express” is premiering this week, and as you may know it is a fully CG movie that uses motion capture to record the movements of various actors (Tom Hanks in five different roles), and animates these recorded performances via CG models. The reviews generally state that the movements of the CG figures are amazingly lifelike, but the character’s eyes appear dead, zombie-like, and creepy. Paul Clinton’s review on CNN said:

This season’s biggest holiday extravaganza, “The Polar Express,” should be subtitled “The Night of the Living Dead.” The characters are that frightening.

The technical issue is that the motion capture cameras cannot currently record the movement of the actor’s eyes, as there is no way to attach sensors to the eye (each actor is covered with hundreds of sensors that the infrared motion capture system can detect). I wonder how difficult it would be to implement retinal tracking, perhaps via goggles.